mirror of
https://github.com/invoke-ai/InvokeAI.git
synced 2025-01-09 12:37:45 +08:00
feat(nodes): add validation for invoke method return types
This commit is contained in:
parent
81bc153399
commit
90232806d9
@ -486,6 +486,26 @@ def invocation(
|
||||
title="type", default=invocation_type, json_schema_extra={"field_kind": FieldKind.NodeAttribute}
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
# Validate the `invoke()` method is implemented
|
||||
if "invoke" in cls.__abstractmethods__:
|
||||
raise ValueError(f'Invocation "{invocation_type}" must implement the "invoke" method')
|
||||
|
||||
# And validate that `invoke()` returns a subclass of `BaseInvocationOutput
|
||||
invoke_return_annotation = signature(cls.invoke).return_annotation
|
||||
try:
|
||||
assert invoke_return_annotation is not BaseInvocationOutput
|
||||
# TODO(psyche): If `invoke()` is not defined, `return_annotation` ends up as the string
|
||||
# "BaseInvocationOutput". This may be a pydantic bug: https://github.com/pydantic/pydantic/issues/7978
|
||||
# I cannot reproduce this in a simple test case, so I'm not sure how to fix it.
|
||||
#
|
||||
# This check should be in a try block, not a conditional, because `issubclass` errors if the first arg is
|
||||
# not a class (e.g. the string "BaseInvocationOutput").
|
||||
assert issubclass(invoke_return_annotation, BaseInvocationOutput)
|
||||
except Exception:
|
||||
raise ValueError(
|
||||
f'Invocation "{invocation_type}" must have a return annotation of a subclass of BaseInvocationOutput (got "{invoke_return_annotation}")'
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
docstring = cls.__doc__
|
||||
cls = create_model(
|
||||
cls.__qualname__,
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user